COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEFT VENTRICULAR VOLUME PARAMETERS BY VISUALISATION METHOD IN PATIENTS WITH MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

Aim. To investigate the parameters of systolic function in patients with acute Q-wave myocardial infarction (AMI), comparing the results of two-dimensional echocardiography (2D EchoCG), three-dimensional real-time EchoCG (3D EchoCG), and computed tomography (CT) as a verification method. To study the parameters of dyssynchrony, which develops due to mechanic myocardial heterogeneity in AMI patients. Material and methods. In total, 82 patients (61 men and 21 women; mean age 52±21 years) were examined within the first 6 days of AMI. The comparison group, comparable by age and sex, included 65 individuals without clinically manifested cardiovascular pathology. All participants underwent standard examinations, electrocardiography (ECG), 24-hour ECG monitoring, EchoCG, angiography, and CT. Mechanic dyssynchrony was assessed by dispersion of the time to the minimal volume of 16 segments (strain dyssynchrony index, SDI). Results. The difference for end-diastolic volume (EDV; 2D vs. 3D EchoCG and 2D EchoCG vs. CT) was statistically significant (respective p-values 0,014 and <0,005). Ejection fraction (EF) and local contractility index (LCI) were significantly different for 2D vs. 3D EchoCG (p=0,0002 and ><0,005, respectively). EF values were similar for 3D EchoCG and CT (p=0,3). SDI values in AMI patients were significantly higher than in the comparison group participants (6,8±2,7% vs. 2,9±1,6%; p><0,001). In patients with anterior AMI, the SDI differences were observed for one vs. two-vessel (p>< 0,005). Ejection fraction (EF) and local contractility index (LCI) were significantly different for 2D vs. 3D EchoCG (p=0,0002 and <0,005, respectively). EF values were similar for 3D EchoCG and CT (p=0,3). SDI values in AMI patients were significantly higher than in the comparison group participants (6,8±2,7% vs. 2,9±1,6%; p><0,001). In patients with anterior AMI, the SDI differences were observed for one vs. two-vessel (p><0,005 , respectively). EF values were similar for 3D EchoCG and CT (p=0,3). SDI values in AMI patients were significantly higher than in the comparison group participants (6,8±2,7% vs. 2,9±1,6%; p<0,001). In patients with anterior AMI, the SDI differences were observed for one vs. two-vessel (p>< 0,001). In patients with anterior AMI, the SDI differences were observed for one vs. two-vessel (p<0,05) and one vs. three-vessel pathology (p<0,005), but not for two vs. three-vessel pathology. Patients with inferior AMI did not demonstrate any marked differences in SDI values. Among patients with SDI >< 0,005), but not for two vs. three-vessel pathology. Patients with inferior AMI did not demonstrate any marked differences in SDI values. Among patients with SDI >5,1, the incidence of clinical complications (pulmonary oedema, ventricular fibrillation, high-grade atrioventricular block) was higher by 55% (p<0,05; r=0,35). SDI was also associated with high-grade ventricular arrhythmias (p><0,005; r=0,48). Conclusion. Three-dimensional visualization provides an opportunity to assess systolic function parameters more accurately. SDI values were linked to the number of affected coronary vessels. The significance of the observed differences was related to AMI localization. SDI could be regarded as a determinant of both mechanical myocardial heterogeneity and the risk of clinical and arrhythmic complications in AMI.><0,05; r=0,35). SDI was also associated with high-grade ventricular arrhythmias (p<0,005; r=0,48). Conclusion. Three-dimensional visualization provides an opportunity to assess systolic function parameters more accurately. SDI values were linked to the number of affected coronary vessels. The significance of the observed differences was related to AMI localization. SDI could be regarded as a determinant of both mechanical myocardial heterogeneity and the risk of clinical and arrhythmic complications in AMI.>< 0,005; r=0,48). Conclusion. Three-dimensional visualization provides an opportunity to assess systolic function parameters more accurately. SDI values were linked to the number of affected coronary vessels. The significance of the observed differences was related to AMI localization. SDI could be regarded as a determinant of both mechanical myocardial heterogeneity and the risk of clinical and arrhythmic complications in AMI.

1. Сamm J., Luscher T., Serruys P. The ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine second edition.M. of.: GEOTAR-Мedia, 2011; р. 82–93. Russian (Кэмм Д., Люшер Т.Ф., Серриус П. Болезни сердца и сосудов. Руководство Европейского общества кардиологов.М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2011; с 82–93).

2. Ciampi Q., Villari B. Role of echocardiography in diagnosis and risk stratification in heart failure with left ventricular systolic dysfunction Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2007; 5:34.

3. Belenkov Yu.N. Thernovoy S.K. The function diagnostics of cardiovascular diseases. M: GEOTAR-media 2007; p. 355–412. Russian (Беленков Ю.Н. Терновой С.К. Функцион альная диагностика сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний.М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа 2007; c. 355–412).

4. Lang R.M., Dent J.M. Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Is it ready for Everyday Clinical Use? J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2009; 2:114–7.

5. Soliman O.I.I., Van Dalen B.M., Geleijnse M. Semi-automated left ventricular function assessment by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography is ready for prime time. European Heart Journal 2009; 30 (Abstract Supplement):342.

6. Аlonso L. Hari P., Pidlaoan P. Acute myocarditis: can novel echocardiographic techniques assist with diagnosis? European Journal of Echocardiography 2010; 11 (3):125–30.

7. Jenkins C. Bricknell K.,ChanComparisonoftwo-andthree-dimensionalechocardiography with segmential magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating left ventricular volume and ejection fraction over time in patients with healed myocardial infarction J. Am J Cardiol 2007; Feb.1: 99–101. Литература

8. Nesser H.J. Sugeng L., Corsi C. et al. Volumetric analysis of regional left ventricular function with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: validation by magnetic resonance and clinical utility testing. Heart 2007; 93: 572–78.

9. De Castro S., Faletra F., Di Angelantonio E. et al. Tomographic Left Ventricular Volumetric Emptying Analysis by Real-Time 3-Dimensional Echocardiography Influence of Left Ventricular dysfunction With and Without Electrical Dyssynchrony.Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging 2008; ¬1:41–8.

10. Соsta R., Reiber J. et al. Cardiovascular imaging 2010 in the International Journal оf Cardiovascular Imaging J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; March 27 (3): 309–19.

11. Jenkins C., Chan J., Hanekom L., Marwick T.H. Accuracy and feasibility of online 3-dimensional echocardiography for measurement of left ventricular parameters. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2006; 19 (9):1119–28.

12. Corsi C., Lang R.M., Veronesi F. et al. Volumetric Quantification of Global and Regional Left Ventricular Function from Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Images, Circulation 2005; 112:1161–70.

13. Sugeng L., Mor-Avi V., Lang R.M. Three-dimensional echocardiography: coming of age. Heart 2008; 94:1123–5.

14. Leung K. Bosch J.G. Automated border detection in three-dimensional echocardiography: principles and promises. European Journal of Echocardiography 2010; 11 (2):97–1084.

15. Muraru D., Badano L.P., Piccoli G. Validation of a novel automated border-detection algorithm for rapid and accurate quantitation of left ventricular volumes based on three-dimensional echocardiography. European Journal of Echocardiography 2010; 11 (4):359–68.