Assessment of vascular age and cardiovascular risk factors among young women in the Moscow region
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2024-5806
EDN: ZLPMEV
Abstract
Aim. To assess vascular age (VA) and the main cardiovascular risk factors (chronological age, body mass index (BMI), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), blood pressure (BP)) in women in the Moscow region.
Material and methods. We assessed BP levels, BMI, PWV, and also calculate vascular age for women participating in the forum. BMI was calculated using the Quetelet index as weight divided by height squared (BMI=kg/m2). BP levels were measured in a sitting position three times on both arms, with the highest result recorded. PWV and vascular age were calculated using AngioScan01. The association between anthropometric measures, vascular stiffness, and VA differences was examined using multivariate linear regression, adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Intergroup (systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg and ≥140 mm Hg) comparisons of PWV and VA difference from actual were performed using a modified Welch's t-test.
Results. The study involved 260 women. The mean age was 44,92±0,85 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 43,27-46,57), mean vascular age — 45,90±1,01 (95% CI 43,91-47,89), mean BMI — 23,383±0,66 kg/m2 (95% CI 22,046-24,720). Mean systolic BP was 127,63±1,89 mm Hg (95% CI 123,89-131,36), diastolic BP 80,031±0,93 (95% CI 78,20-81,86), mean PWV was 11,38±0,16 m/sec (95% CI 11,05-11,70). Analysis of the VA difference between women with BMI <25 kg/m2 (BMI1, n=93) and ≥25 kg/m2 (BMI2, n=67) revealed a significant difference in the calculated VA values (p=0,0002) between groups.
Conclusion. Modern young women have high rates of vascular stiffness, which may determine the increase in morbidity and mortality rates in the working-age female population. The VA indicator predicts cardiovascular events and can be considered as an effective screening method for assessing cardiovascular risk, which is especially important for young patients.
About the Authors
T. K. ChernyavskayaRussian Federation
Moscow
S. N. Erofeeva
Moscow
References
1. Khan M, Hashim M, Mustafa H, et al. Global Epidemiology of Ischemic Heart Disease: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Cureus. 2020;12(7):e9349. doi:10.7759/cureus.9349.
2. Mehta PK, Wei J, Wenger NK. Ischemic Heart Disease in Women: A Focus on Risk Factors. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2015;25(2):140-51. doi:10.1016/j.tcm.2014.10.005.
3. Park KE, Pepine CJ. Assessing cardiovascular risk in women: Looking beyond traditional risk factors. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2015;25(2):152-3.
4. Mosca L, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, et al. Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women — 2011 update: A guideline from the American heart association. Circulation. 2011;123:1243-62.
5. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(29):2315-81. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106.
6. Kukharchuk VV, Ezhov MV, Sergienko IV, et al. Diagnostics and correction of lipid metabolism disorders in order to prevent and treat of atherosclerosis Russian recommendations VII revision. The Journal of Atherosclerosis and Dyslipidemias. 2020;(1):7-40. (In Russ.)
7. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(1):111-88. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2020;41(44):4255.
8. Canto JG, Kiefe СI, Rogers WJ, et al. Number of coronary heart disease risk factors and mortality in patients with first myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2011;306(19):2120-7. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1654.
9. Nilsson PM, Lurbe E, Laurent S. The early life origins of vascular ageing and cardiovascular risk: the EVA syndrome [review]. J. Hypertens. 2008;26(6):1049-57.
10. Lakatta EG, Levy D. Arterial and cardiac aging: major shareholders in cardiovascular disease enterprises: Part I: aging arteries: a "set up" for vascular disease. Circulation. 2003;107(1):13946.
11. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:2588-605.
12. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am College Cardiol. 2010;55(13):1318-27. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.061.
13. Mitchell GF, Hwang SJ, Vasan RS, et al. Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2010;121:505-11.
14. O'Rourke MF, Hashimoto J. Mechanical factors in arterial aging: a clinical perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(1):113.
15. Nichols WW, McDonald DA. McDonald's blood flow in arteries: theoretic, experimental, and clinical principles. 6th ed. London: Hodder Arnold; 2011. xiv, 755 p.
16. Cunhaa PG, Olsen MH. Vascular Aging and Cardiovascular Disease. Chapter 24. Early Vascular Aging (EVA). New Directions in Cardiovascular Protection. 2015:261-71. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-801387-8.00025-9.
17. D'Agostino RB, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2008;117(6):743-53. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579.
18. Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. European Heart Journal. 2021;42(34):3227-3337. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484.
19. Kobalava ZhD, Konradi AO, Nedogoda SV, et al. Arterial hypertension in adults. Clinical guidelines 2020. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(3):3786. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3-3786.
20. van den Munckhof ICL, Holewijn S, de Graaf J, Rutten JHW. Sex differences in fat distribution influence the association between BMI and arterial stiffness. J Hypertens. 2017;35(6):1219-25. doi:10.1097/HJH.0000000000001297.
21. Vallée A, Olié V, Lelong HÉL, et al. Relationship between BMI and aortic stiffness: influence of anthropometric indices in hypertensive men and women. J Hypertens. 2020;38(2):249-56. doi:10.1097/HJH.0000000000002228.
22. Soureti A, Hurling R, Murray P, et al. Evaluation of a cardiovascular disease risk assessment tool for the promotion of healthier lifestyles. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17(5):519-23. doi:10.1097/HJR.0b013e328337ccd3.
23. Zuo Y, Chen S, Tian X, et al. Association of Vascular Aging With Cardiovascular Disease in Middle-Aged Chinese People: A Prospective Cohort Study. JACC Asia. 2023;3(6):895-904. doi:10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.07.014.
24. Najafov RN. Relationship between vascular age and atherosclerosis-related cardiovascular diseases. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;26(6):4540. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4540.
25. Akopyan AA, Strazhesko ID, Klyashtorny VG, Orlova IA. Biological vascular age and its relationship with cardiovascular risk factors. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2022;21(1):2877. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2022-2877.
26. Groenewegen KA, den Ruijter HM, Pasterkamp G, et al. Vascular age to determine cardiovascular disease risk: A systematic review of its concepts, defi nitions, and clinical applications. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23(3):264-74. doi:10.1177/2047487314566999.
27. Łoboz-Rudnicka M, Jaroch J, Bociąga Z, et al. Relationship between vascular age and classic cardiovascular risk factors and arterial stiffness. Cardiol J. 2013;20(4):394-401. doi:10.5603/CJ.2013.0098.
28. de Andrade CR, Silva EL, da Matta MF, et al. Vascular or chronological age: which is the better marker to estimate the cardiovascular risk in patients with type 1 diabetes? Acta Diabetol. 2016;53(6):925-33. doi:10.1007/s00592-016-0891-8.
29. Karpov YuA, Sorokin EV. The effect of combined antihypertensive therapy on the risk of cardiovascular complications and vascular age: the results of a multicenter open-label study of ADVANTAGE. Atmosphere. Cardiology news. 2015;(3):2-10. (In Russ.) EDN VBSMDT.
- The vascular age predicts the risk of cardiovascular events. There is a relationship between vascular age, stiffness and endothelial function.
- Modern young women have high rates of vascular stiffness, which may determine the increase in morbidity and mortality rates in the working-age female population.
- Potential predictors of adverse outcomes are proposed. Modifiable risk factors, primarily blood pressure, should be addressed.
Review
For citations:
Chernyavskaya T.K., Erofeeva S.N. Assessment of vascular age and cardiovascular risk factors among young women in the Moscow region. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29(2):5806. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2024-5806. EDN: ZLPMEV