Electroanatomic substrate of atrial fibrillation in patients after COVID-19
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4526
Abstract
Aim. To determine the features of left atrial electroanatomic structure and the arrhythmia substrate in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Material and methods. The pilot study included 20 patients with AF who underwent catheter radiofrequency ablation. Ten patients had COVID-19 and 10 patients were included as a control group. AF substrate was identified using anatomic and bipolar mapping. Zones with following amplitudes were analyzed: <0,25 mV, <0,5 mV, from 0,5 to 0,75 mV inclusive, and >0,75 mV. Left atrial volume was determined based on anatomic map.
Results. The groups were homogeneous in AF type, number of patients after prior pulmonary vein isolation, and heart rate during mapping. In the COVID-19 group, there was a higher area of fibrous zones with an amplitude of <0,25 mV (51,5±16,6% vs 29,1±16,1% in the control group, p=0,007), <0,5 mV (76,7±11,5% vs 45,6±22,7% in the control group, p=0,001) and a lower area of intact myocardium with an amplitude >0,75 mV (11,6±8,0% vs 45,0±25,0% in the control group, p=0,001). In 7 COVID-19 patients, the posterior wall was isolated due to low-amplitude zones. Of these, three patients underwent surgery for the first time. According to ROC analysis, in patients after COVID-19, fibrous tissue (<0,5 mV) occupies more than half of the area, while normal tissue (>0,75 mV) — ~30% or less.
Conclusion. This study shows that SARS-CoV-2 infection may cause left atrial remodeling in the form of diffuse fibrosis. The arrhythmia substrate in patients after COVID-19 can be localized not only in pulmonary vein mouths, but also in other left atrial areas. This must be taken into account before ablation, even if the procedure is being performed for the first time. It is recommended to perform amplitude mapping for all patients who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection in order to identify fibrous zones and plan the operation extent.
About the Authors
An. M. OsadchyRussian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
None
V. V. Semenyuta
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
None
A. V. Kamenev
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
None
S. G. Shcherbak
Russian Federation
Saint Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
None
D. S. Lebedev
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
None
References
1. Nicin L, AbPlanalP WT, Mellentin H, et al. Cell tyPe-sPecific exPression of the Putative SARS-CoV-2 recePtor ACE2 in human hearts. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(19):1804-6. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa311.
2. Kochi AN, Tagliari AP, Forleo GB, et al. Cardiac and arrhythmic comPlications in Patients with COVID-19. J Cardiovasc ElectroPhysiol. 2020;31(5):1003-8. doi:10.1111/jce.14479.
3. Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrosPective, observational study. Lancet ResPir Med. 2020;8(5):475-81. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30079-5.
4. Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute resPiratory distress syndrome. Lancet ResPir Med. 2020;8(4):420-2. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30076-X.
5. Chen C, Zhou Y, Wang DW. SARS-CoV-2: a Potential novel etiology of fulminant myocarditis. Herz. 2020;45(3):230-2. doi:10.1007/s00059-020-04909-z.
6. LiPPi G, Lavie CJ, Sanchis-Gomar F. Cardiac troPonin I in Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Evidence from a meta-analysis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020;63(3):390-1. doi:10.1016/j.Pcad.2020.03.001.
7. LiPPi G, Plebani M. Laboratory abnormalities in Patients with COVID-2019 infection. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020;58(7):1131-4. doi:10.1515/cclm-2020-0198.
8. Alhogbani T. Acute myocarditis associated with novel Middle east resPiratory syndrome coronavirus. Ann Saudi Med. 2016;36(1):78-80. doi:10.5144/0256-4947.2016.78.
9. Del Valle DM, Kim-Schulze S, Huang H-H, et al. An inflammatory cytokine signature Predicts COVID-19 severity and survival. Nat Med. 2020;26(10):1636-43. doi:10.1038/s41591-020-1051-9.
10. Hu Y-F, Chen Y-J, Lin Y-J, et al. Inflammation and the Pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12(4):230-43. doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2015.2.
11. Coromilas EJ, Kochav S, Goldenthal I, et al. Worldwide Survey of COVID-19-Associated Arrhythmias. Circ Arrhythmia ElectroPhysiol. 2021;14(3):285-95. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009458.
12. Marrouche NF, Wilber D, Hindricks G, et al. Association of Atrial Tissue Fibrosis Identified by Delayed Enhancement MRI and Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation: The DECAAF Study. JAMA. 2014;311(5):498-506. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.3.
13. SPragg DD, Khurram I, Zimmerman SL, et al. Initial exPerience with magnetic resonance imaging of atrial scar and co-registration with electroanatomic voltage maPPing during atrial fibrillation: Success and limitations. Hear Rhythm. 2012;9(12):2003-9. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.08.039.
14. Badger TJ, Daccarett M, Akoum NW, et al. Evaluation of left atrial lesions after initial and rePeat atrial fibrillation ablation: lessons learned from delayed-enhancement MRI in rePeat ablation Procedures. Circ Arrhythm ElectroPhysiol. 2010;3(3):249-59. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.109.868356.
15. Yagishita A, De Oliveira S, Cakulev I, et al. Correlation of Left Atrial Voltage Distribution Between Sinus Rhythm and Atrial Fibrillation: Identifying Structural Remodeling by 3-D Electroanatomic MaPPing IrresPective of the Rhythm. J Cardiovasc ElectroPhysiol. 2016;27(8):905-12. doi:10.1111/jce.13002.
16. Saghy L, Callans DJ, Garcia F, et al. Is there a relationshiP between comPlex fractionated atrial electrograms recorded during atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm fractionation? Hear Rhythm. 2012;9(2):181-8. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.09.062.
17. KaPa S, Desjardins B, Callans DJ, et al. Contact Electroanatomic MaPPing Derived Voltage Criteria for Characterizing Left Atrial Scar in Patients Undergoing Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation. J Cardiovasc ElectroPhysiol. 2014;25(10):1044-52. doi:10.1111/jce.12452.
18. Orshanskaya VS, Kamenev AV, Belyakova LA, et al. Left atrial electroanatomic substrate as a Predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence after circular radiofrequency Pulmonary veins isolation. Observational ProsPective study results. Russ J Cardiol. 2017;148(8):82-9. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2017-8-82-89.
19. KottkamP H, Berg JAN, Bender R, et al. Box Isolation of Fibrotic Areas (BIFA): A Patient-Tailored Substrate Modification APProach for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. J Cardiovasc ElectroPhysiol. 2016;27(1):22-30. doi:10.1111/jce.128709.
20. Schreiber D, Rieger A, Moser F, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with box isolation of fibrotic areas: Lessons on fibrosis distribution and extent, clinical characteristics, and their imPact on long-term outcome. J Cardiovasc ElectroPhysiol. 2017;28(9):971-83. doi:10.1111/jce.13278.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Osadchy A.M., Semenyuta V.V., Kamenev A.V., Shcherbak S.G., Lebedev D.S. Electroanatomic substrate of atrial fibrillation in patients after COVID-19. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;26(7):4526. https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4526