Preview

Russian Journal of Cardiology

Advanced search

Clinical diagnostics of fibrillinopathies (type 1)

https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2013-2-89-93

Abstract

Diagnostic criteria are presented for the syndromes related to mutations of fibrillin gene type 1 (such as Marfan syndrome, ectopia lentis, MASS phenotype, mitral valve prolapse syndrome, stiff skin syndrome, Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome) and for the acromelic group of dysplasias (such as geleophysic dysplasia, Weill-Marchesani syndrome, and acromicria).

About the Author

E. L. Trisvetova
Belorussia State Medical University, Minsk, Belorussia
Belarus


References

1. Kadurina T. I., Gorbunova V. N. Connective tissue dysplasia. Guide for physicians. SPb.: ELBI SPb; 2009. Russian (КадуринаТ. И., ГорбуноваВ. Н. Дисплазиясоединительной ткани. Руководстводляврачей. СПб.: ЭЛБИСПб, 2009).

2. Kielty C. M., Sherratt M. J., Marson A., et al. Fibrillinmicrofibrils. Adv Protein Chem. 2005; 70:405–36.

3. Bowers S. L., Banerjee I., Baudino T. A. The extracellular matrix: at the center of it all. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2010; 48 (3):474–82.

4. Corson G. M., Charbonneau N. L., Keene D. R., et al. Differential expression of fibrillin-3 adds to microfibril variety in human and avian, but not rodent, connective tissues. Genomics 2004; 3 (83):461–72.

5. Zhang H., Apfelroth S. D., Hu W., et al. Structure and expression of fibrillin-2, a novel microfibrillar component preferentially located in elastic matrices. J Cell Biol 1994; 124:855–63.

6. Dietz H. C., Pyeritz R. E. Mutations in the human gene for fibrillin-1 (FBN1) in the Marfan syndrome and related disorders. Hum Mol Genet 1995; 4 (spec no):1799–809.

7. Dietz H. C., Loeys B., Carta L., et al. Recent progress towards a molecular understanding of Marfan syndrome. Am J Med Genet 2005; 139:4–9.

8. Faivre L., Collod-Beroud G., Callewaert B., et al. Pathogenic FBN1 mutations in 146 adults not meeting clinical diagnostic criteria for Marfan syndrome: further delineation of type 1 fibrillinopathies and focus on patients with an isolated major criterion. Am J Med Genet 2009; 149A (5):854–60.

9. Halliday D. J., Hutchinson S., Lonie L., et al. Twelve novel FBN1 mutations in Marfan syndrome and Marfan related phenotypes test the feasibility of FBN1 mutation testing in clinical practice. J Med Genet 2002; 39:589–93.

10. Loeys B. L., Dietz H. C., Braverman A. C. et al. The revised Ghent nosology for the Marfan syndrome J Med Genet 2010; 47:476–85.

11. Inherited Connective Tissue Disorders in Cardiology. Diagnostic and Treatment. Russ J Cardiol 2013; 1 (99), Suppl. 1. Russian (Наследственные нарушения соединительной ткани в кардиологии. Диагностика и лечение. Российский кардиологический журнал

12. ; 1 (99), приложение 1).

13. Ades L. C., HolmanK. J., Brett M. S. et al. Ectopialentis phenotypes and the FBN1 gene. Am J Med Genet 2004; 126A:284–9.

14. Robinson P. N., Godfrey M. The molecular genetics of Marfan syndrome and related microfibrillopathies. J Med Genet 2000; 37:9–25.

15. Zemtsovsky E. V., Malev E. G. Minor abnormalities of the heart and dysplastic phenotypes. SPb.: Publishing House “IFEREL”, 2012. Russian (Земцовский Э. В., Малев Э. Г. Малые аномалии cердца и диспластические фенотипы. СПб.: Изд-во «ИВЭСЭП», 2012).

16. Liu T., McCalmonet T. H., Frieden I. J. et al. The stiff skin syndrome: Case series, differential diagnosis of the stiff skin phenotype, and review of the literature. Arch Dermatol 2008; 144:1351.

17. Jablonska S., Blaszczyk M. Scleroderma-like indurations involving fascias: an abortive form of congenital fascial dystrophy (stiff skin syndrome). PediatrDermatol 2000; 17 (2):105–10.

18. Ad s L. C., Sullivan K., Biggin A., et al. FBN1, TGFBR1, and the Marfancraniosynostosis/mental retardation disorders revisited. Am J Med Genet 2006; 140:1047–58.

19. Kosaki K., Takahashi D., Udaka T., et al. Molecular pathology of Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome. Am J Med Genet 2006; 140:104–8.

20. Loeys B. L., Gerber E. E., Riegert-Johnson D., et al. Mutations in fibrillin-1 cause congenital scleroderma: stiff skin syndrome. SciTransl Med 2010; 2:20–3.

21. Le Goff C., Cormier-Daire V. Genetic and molecular aspects of acromelic dysplasia. PediatrEndocrinol 2009; Rev 6:418–23.

22. Le Goff C., Mahaut C., Wang L. W. Mutations in the TGF

23. Scott A., Yeung S., Dickinson D., et al. Natural history of cardiac involvement in geleophysic dysplasia. Am J Med Genet 2005; 132A (3):320–3.

24. Giray O., K r M., Bora E., et al. Clinical and morphological phenotype of geleophysic

25. dysplasia. Annals of Tropical Paediatrics: International Child Health 2008; 2 (28):161–4.

26. Dagoneau N., Benoist-Lasselin C., Huber C. et al. ADAMTS10 mutations in autosomal recessive Weill-Marchesani syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2004; 75:801–6.

27. Dal D., Sahin A., Aypar U. Anesthetic management of a patient with Weill–Marchesani syndrome. ActaAnaesthesiolScand 2003; 47:369–70.

28. van de Woestijnea P. C., HarkelbA. Derk-J. T., Bogersa Ad J. J. C. Two patients with Weill–Marchesani syndrome and mitral stenosis. Interact CardioVascThoracSurg 2004; 3 (3):484–5.

29. Faivre L., Le Merrer M., Baumann C., et al. Acromicric dysplasia: long term outcome and evidence of autosomal dominant inheritance. J Med Genet 2001; 38:745–9.

30. Chang B. M., Liebmann J. M. et al. Angle closure in younger patients. Trans Am OphthalmolSoc 2002; 100:201–12.


Review

For citations:


Trisvetova E.L. Clinical diagnostics of fibrillinopathies (type 1). Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2013;(2):89-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2013-2-89-93

Views: 660


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1560-4071 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7620 (Online)