Population characteristics of hostility among the population of a medium urban Siberian city: age and sex aspects
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3688
Abstract
Aim. To assess age and sex characteristics of hostility among the population of a medium urban Siberian city.
Material and methods. Cross-sectional epidemiological studies were carried out among men and women aged 25-64 years in Tyumen; the response rate was 85,0% among men and 70,3% among women. To assess hostility, the algorithms of the WHO program MONICA-Psychosocial were used. There were low, moderate and high levels of hostility. Low hostility was considered the population norm.
Results. In the open population of a medium urban Siberian city, an unfavorable data was found for the hostility prevalence. High levels of hostility were revealed in both men and women in the whole age range. However, a high level of hostility prevailed among women compared to general population values by age and in four decades of life.
Conclusion. The data obtained will help to develop evidence-based prevention programs based on the effects on psychosocial factors taking into account age and sex characteristics.
About the Authors
M. M. Kayumova
Tyumen Cardiology Research Center — branch of the Tomsk National Research Medical Center
Russian Federation
Tomsk
Russian Federation
Tomsk
M. Yu. Akimov
Tyumen Industrial University
Russian Federation
Tyumen
Russian Federation
Tyumen
V. V. Gafarov
Research Institute of Internal and Preventive Medicine — branch of the Federal Research Center Institute for Cytology and Genetics
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk
References
1. Nabi H, Singh-Manoux A, Ferrie J, et al. Hostility and depressive mood: results from the Whitehall II prospective cohort study. Psychol. Med. 2010;40(3):405-13. doi:10.1017/S0033291709990432.
2. Barefoot JC, Dahlstrom GW, Williams RB. Hostility, CHD incidence and total mortality: a 25-year follow-up study of 255 physicians. Psychosom. Med. 1983;45(1):59-63. doi:10.1097/00006842-198303000-00008.
3. Müller J, Hallqvist J, Diderichsen F, et al. Do Episodes of Anger Trigger Myocardial Infarction? Psychosom. Med. 1999;61:842-9. doi:10.1097/00006842-199911000-00019.
4. Brondolo E, Grantham K, Karlin W, et al. Trait hostility and ambulatory blood pressure among traffic enforcement agents: The effects of stressful social interactions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2009;14(2):110-21. doi:10.1037/a0014768.
5. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Atherosclerosis. 2016;252:207-74. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.05.037.
6. Gafarov VV, Panov DO, Gromova EA, et al. An association of hostility with awareness of health and other psychosocial factors in an open female population aged 25–64 years in Novosibirsk. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika. 2016;(8)1:16-21. (In Russ.) doi:10.14412/2074-2711-2016-1-16-21.
7. Boytsov SA, Deev AD, Shalnova SA. Mortality and risk factors for non-communicable diseases in Russia: Specific features, trends, and prognosis. Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2017;89(1):5-13. (In Russ.) doi:10.17116/terarkh20178915-13.
8. Kravchenko AYa, Labzhaniya NB, Bogomolova AD. Investigation of the relationship of aggressiveness and hostility with myocardial infarction. Molodoj uchenyj. 2014;8:343-7.
9. Akimova EV, Akimov MYu, Gakova EI, et al. Association of high levels of hostility and coronary heart disease in an open urban population among men aged 25-64. Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2017;89(1):28-31. (In Russ.) doi:10.17116/terarkh201789128-31.
10. Akimov AM, Gakova EI, Akimova AA, et al. The associations between parameters of stress in the workplace and nature of work in women of the urban population. Sibirskiy medicinskiy zhurnal. 2016;31(4):76-9. (In Russ.)
11. Akimov AM. Stress in family and social support in men population. Istoricheskaya i social’no-obrazovatel’naya mysl’. 2013;6:103-5. (In Russ.)
12. Kjøllesdal MK, Ariansen I, Mortensen LH, et al. Educational differences in cardiovascular mortality: The role of shared family factors and cardiovascular risk factors. Scand J Public Health. 2016;44(8):744-50. doi:10.1177/1403494816669427.
13. Kayumova MM, Akimova EV, Gafarov VV, et al. A life-exhaustion: interrelation with the prevalence of ischemic heart disease. Russ J Cardiol. 2014;(8):68-72. (In Russ). doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2014-8-68-72.
14. Versey H, Kaplan G. Mediation and Moderation of the Association Between Cynical Hostility and Systolic Blood Pressure in Low-Income Women. Health Education & Behavior. 2011;39(2):219-28. doi:10.1177/1090198111414884.
15. Briggs A, Wolstenholme J, Blakely T, et al. Choosing an epidemiological model structure for the economic evaluation of non-communicable disease public health interventions. Popul Health Metr. 2016;14:17. doi:10.1186/S12963-016-0085-1.
Review
For citations:
Kayumova M.M., Akimov M.Yu., Gafarov V.V. Population characteristics of hostility among the population of a medium urban Siberian city: age and sex aspects. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(6):3688. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3688
Views:
575
Email this article 