SYNTAX scale estimates of coronary stenosis severity and outcomes of various revascularisation strategies in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and multi-vessel coronary pathology
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2013-2-31-37
Abstract
Aim. To assess 30-day and long-term outcomes of various revascularisation strategies in patients with myocardial infarction and ST segment elevation (STEMI) and multi-vessel coronary pathology (MVCP), in regard to the severity of coronary stenosis, as assessed by the SYNTAX scale.
Material and methods. The 30-day and long-term outcomes of various strategies of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were assessed in 227 STEMI patients, in regard to the severity of their coronary stenosis (as assessed by the SYNTAX scale). Group 1 included 40 patients who underwent multi-vessel stenting (MVS) as a part of their primary PCI, while Group 2 included 187 patients with indications for staged revascularisation (SR).
Results. At baseline, the MVS and SR subgroups with severe coronary stenosis (SYNTAX score
About the Authors
R. S. Tarasov
Research Institute of Complex Cardiovascular Problems, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Kemerovo, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. I. Ganyukov
Research Institute of Complex Cardiovascular Problems, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Kemerovo, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
P. A. Shushpannikov
Research Institute of Complex Cardiovascular Problems, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Kemerovo, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
P. A. Krotikov
Research Institute of Complex Cardiovascular Problems, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Kemerovo, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
O. L. Barbarash
Research Institute of Complex Cardiovascular Problems, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Kemerovo, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
L. S. Barbarash
Research Institute of Complex Cardiovascular Problems, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Kemerovo, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Corpus R. A., House J. A., Marso S. P., et al. Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease and acute myocardial infarction. Am. Heart J. 2004; 148 (3):493–00.
2. Sorjja P., Gersh B. J., Cox D. A. et al. Impact of multivessel disease on reperfusion success and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J. 2007; 28:1709–16.
3. Jan-Henk E., Dambrink J. P., Debrauwere, Arnoud W. J. et al. Non-culprit lesions detected during primary PCI: treat invasively or follow the guidelines? Eurointervention. 2010; 5:968–75.
4. Cardarelli F., Bellasi A., Fang-Shu Ou et al. Combined impact of age and estimated glomerular filtration rate on in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction (from the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry). Am. J. Cardiol. 2009; 103:766–71.
5. Lee J. H., Park H. S., Chae S. C. et al. Wee Hyun Park and Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Investigators. Predictors of six-month major adverse cardiac events in 30-day survivors after acute myocardial infarction (from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry). Am. J. Cardiol. 2009;104:182–89.
6. Rasoul S., Ottervanger J. P., de Boer M. J. et al. Predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Coron. Artery Dis. 2009; 20:415–21.
7. Toma M., Buller C. E., Westerhout C. M. et al. for the APEX-AMI Investigators. Nonculprit coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention during acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: insights from the APEX-AMI trial. Eur. Heart J. 2010; 31:1701–07.
8. Di Mario C., Mara S., Flavio A., et al. Single vs. multivessel treatment during primary angioplasty: results of the multicentre randomised HEpacoat for cuLPrit or multivessel stenting for Acute Myocardial Infarction (HELP AMI) Study. Int. J. Cardiovasc Intervent. 2004; 6 (3–4):128–33.
9. Tarasov R. S., Ganyukov V. I., Barbarash O. L., et al. The Specification of Revascularization Strategy in Patients with ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multi-vessel Disease. Pathol. Circulation Cardiac surgery 2011; 2:33–7. Russian (Тарасов Р. С., Ганюков В. И., Барбараш О. Л., и др. Выбор стратегии реваскуляризации у больных инфарктом миокарда с элевацией сегмента ST при многососудистом поражении. Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия 2011; 2:33–7).
10. Kushner F. G., Hand M., Smith S. C., et al. 2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009; 54:2205–41.
11. Papamichael N. D., Michalis L. K. Staged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Multivessel STEMI Patients? HOSPITAL CHRONICLES. 2010; SUPPLEMENT:58–59.
12. Parodi G., Memisha G., Valenti R. et al. Five year outcome after primary coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: results from a single centre experience. Heart. 2005; 91:1541–4.
13. Qarawani D., Nahir M., Abboud M. et al. Culprit only versus complete coronary revascularization during primary PCI. Int. J. Cardiol. 2008; 123:288–92.
14. Barbarash L. S., Ganyukov V. I. Organization and tactic of percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Kemerovo; 2012. Russian (Барбараш Л. С., Ганюков В. И. Организация и тактика проведения чрескожного коронарного вмешательства при инфаркте миокарда с подъемом сегмента ST. Кемерово; 2012).
Review
For citations:
Tarasov R.S., Ganyukov V.I., Shushpannikov P.A., Krotikov P.A., Barbarash O.L., Barbarash L.S. SYNTAX scale estimates of coronary stenosis severity and outcomes of various revascularisation strategies in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and multi-vessel coronary pathology. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2013;(2):31-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2013-2-31-37
Views:
580
Email this article 