Authorship: From Credit to Accountability

The Editors' Network of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) provides a dynamic forum for editorial discussions and endorses the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) to improve the scientific quality of biomedical journals. Authorship confers credit and important academic rewards. Recently, however, the ICMJE emphasized that authorship also requires responsibility and accountability. These issues are now covered by the new (fourth) criterion for authorship. Authors should agree to be accountable and ensure that questions regarding the accuracy and integrity of the entire work will be appropriately addressed. This review discusses the implications of this paradigm shift on authorship requirements with the aim of increasing awareness on good scientific and editorial practices.

1. The International Committee of Medical Journals Editors. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. Available: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations.

2. Luscher TF. The codex of science: honesty, precision, and truth-and its violations. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1018-23.

3. Alfonso F, Ambrosio G, Pinto FJ, et al. Editors' Network ESC Task Force. European

4. Society of Cardiology national cardiovascular journals: the 'Editors' Network'. Eur Heart J.2010;31:26-8. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp462.

5. Mills P, Timmis A, Huber K, et al. The role of European national journals in education. Heart. 2009;95:e3.

6. Alfonso F, Timmis A, Pinto FJ, et al. Editors' Network European Society of Cardiology Task Force. Conflict of interest policies and disclosure requirements among European Society of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Journals. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:587-94. doi:101093/eurheartj/ehr464.

7. Alfonso F, Data Sharing. Editors' Network European Society of Cardiology Task Force; Editors' Network European Society of Cardiology Task Force. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:1361-3. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx206.

8. Council of Science Editors. White Paper on Publication Ethics. CSE's White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications, 2012 Update Available: http://www.CouncilScienceEditors.org.

9. World Association of Medical Editors. WAME Professionalism Code of Conduct. The new WAME Professionalism Code of Conduct for medical journal editors. Available: http://www.wame.org.

10. Committee On Publication Ethics. COPE. Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. Available: http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines.

11. Stephenson J. ICMJE: All authors of medical Journal articles have “responsibility to stand by the integrity of the entire work”. JAMA. 2013;310:1216.

12. No author listed. The Lancet. Authorship and accountability. Lancet. 2013;382:744.

13. Goodman NW. Survey of fulfillment of criteria for authorship in published medical research. BMJ. 1994;309:1482.

14. Rennie D, Flanagin A. Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. JAMA. 1994;271:469-71.

15. Rennie D, Yank V, Emanuel L. When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA. 1997;278:579-85.

16. Leonelli S. Locating ethics in data science: responsibility and accountability in global and distributed knowledge production systems. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016;374(2083). doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0122.

17. Helgesson G, Eriksson S. Responsibility for scientific misconduct in collaborative papers. Med Health Care Philos. 2018;21:423-30.

18. Stocks A, Simcoe D, Toroser D, DeTora L. Substantial contribution and accountability: best authorship practices for medical writers in biomedical publications. Curr Med Res Opin. 2018;34:1163-8.doi:10.1007/s11019-017-9817-7.

19. Clement TP. Authorship matrix: a rational approach to quantify individual contributions and responsibilities in multi-author scientific articles. Sci Eng Ethics. 2014;20:345-61. doi:10.1007/s11948-013-9454-3.

20. Fairbairn S, Kelly L, Mahar S, Prosee R. Authorship: an evolving concept. Editorial coordinators. Health Learning, Research & Practice, Wolkers and Kluber. Available: http://wkauthorservices.editage.com/resources/files/An_Evolving_Concept_in_Scientific_and_Medical_Publishing.pdf.

21. Nylenna M, Fagerbakk F, Kierulf P. Authorship: attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers. BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15:53. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-53.

22. Hess CW, Bruckner C, Kaiser T, et al. Authorship in scientific publications: analysis and recommendations. Swiss Med Wkly. 2015;145:w14108. doi:10.4414/smw.2015.14108.

23. Hwang SS, Song HH, Baik JH, et al. Researcher contributions and fulfillment of ICMJE authorship criteria: analysis of author contribution lists in research articles with multiple authors published in radiology. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Radiology. 2003;226:16-23.

24. Hoen WP, Walvoort HC, Overbeke AJ. What are the factors determining authorship and the order of the authors' names? A study among authors of the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (Dutch Journal of Medicine). JAMA. 1998;280:217-8.

25. Wager E. Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship? Med Gen Med. 2007;9:16.

26. Resnik DB, Tyler AM, Black JR, Kissling G. Authorship policies of scientific journals. J Med Ethics. 2016;42:199-202.

27. Akhabue E, Lautenbach E. “Equal” contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship. Ann Epidemiol. 2010;20:868-71. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.08.004.

28. Dotson B. Equal contributions and credit assigned to authors in pharmacy journals. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77:39. doi:10.5688/ajpe77239.

29. Li Z, Sun YM, Wu FX, et al. Equal contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship in major anaesthesia journals during a 10-yr period. PLoS One. 2013;8:e71430. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071430.

30. Tarkang EE, Kweku M, Zotor FB. Publication Practices and Responsible Authorship: A Review Article. J Public Health Afr. 2017;8:723. doi:10.4081/jphia.2017.723.

31. Ioannidis JP. A generalized view of self-citation: direct, co-author, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation. J Psychosom Res. 2015;78:7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.11.008.

32. Chow DS, Ha R, Filippi CG. Increased rates of authorship in radiology publications: a bibliometric analysis of 142,576 articles published worldwide by radiologists between 1991 and 2012. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204:W52-7.

33. Shapiro DW, Wenger NS, Shapiro MF. The contributions of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers. JAMA. 1994;271:438-42.

34. Flanagin A, Carey LA, Fontanarosa PB, et al. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA 1998,280:222-4.

35. Laine C, Mulrow CD. Exorcising ghosts and unwelcome guests. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:611-2.

36. Wislar JS, Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB, Deangelis CD. Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey. BMJ 2011;343:d6128. doi:10.1136/bmj.d6128.

37. Stretton S. Systematic review on the primary and secondary reporting of the prevalence of ghostwriting in the medical literature. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e004777. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004777.

38. Smith R. Let's simply scrap authorship and move to contributorship. BMJ. 2012;344:e157. doi:10.1136/bmj.e157.

39. Tilak G, Prasad V, Jena AB. Authorship Inflation in Medical Publications. Inquiry. 2015 29;52. doi:10.1177/0046958015598311.

40. Juyal D, Thawani V, Thaledi S, Prakash A. The fruits of authorship. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2014;27:217-20. doi:10.4103/1357-6283.143777.