Preview

Russian Journal of Cardiology

Advanced search

Comparison of the association of brachial arterial pressure and parameters of central aortic pressure with left ventricular hypertrophy in the general population of Novosibirsk

https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2019-1-18-22

Abstract

Aim. There is evidence that central aortic blood pressure (BP) is more associated with left ventricular myocardial hypertrophy than brachial BP. The purpose of this work is to compare the association of brachial and central aortic BP with electrocardiographic parameters of left ventricular hypertrophy in the general population of Novosibirsk.

Material and methods. We examined 327 people: 155 men and 172 women aged 25-44 years from a representative sample from the general population of Novosibirsk. The study program included anthropometry, BP measurement, electrocardiography, biochemical blood analysis. Radial artery applanation tonometry and pulse wave analysis were performed using the SphygmoCor system. Left ventricular hypertrophy was determined by electrocardiographic parameters.

Results. In the general population of Novosibirsk, central aortic BP is more associated with left ventricular myocardial hypertrophy than brachial BP. Central pulse pressure, in contrast to brachial BP, is significantly associated with the R+S index (p=0,0085), as well as RI (p=0,0038) and RaVL (p=0,0039) wave amplitude. Central systolic aortic BP, in contrast to brachial systolic BP, is significantly associated with RI (p=0,042) and RaVL (p=0,029) wave amplitudes. Amplification parameters of central aortic BP, regardless of brachial BP, are associated with indices of left ventricular hypertrophy. Pulse pressure amplification in groups with or without left ventricular hypertrophy, standardized for age, gender, height, waist circumference, heart rate, triglyceride levels, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood glucose, and brachial pulse pressure, was 13,3 mm Hg and 12,5 mm Hg, respectively (p=0,035).

Conclusion. The results of this study substantiate the relevance of the practical use of central aortic BP parameters in addition to the office measurement of brachial BP.

About the Authors

E. E. Tsvetkova
Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Competing Interests:

Conflicts of interest nothing to declare



A. A. Kuznetsov
Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Competing Interests:

Conflicts of interest nothing to declare



D. V. Denisova
Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Competing Interests:

Conflicts of interest nothing to declare



Yu. I. Ragino
Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Competing Interests:

Conflicts of interest nothing to declare



M. I. Voevoda
Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Competing Interests:

Conflicts of interest nothing to declare



References

1. Protogerou AD, Papaioannou TG, Blacher J et al. Central blood pressures: do we need them in the management of cardiovascular disease? Is it a feasible therapeutic target? J Hypertens. 2007;25(2):265-72. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e3280114f23.

2. McEniery CM, Cockcroft JR, Roman MJ, et al. Central blood pressure: current evidence and clinical importance. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(26):1719-25. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht565.

3. Kroeker EJ, Wood EH. Comparison of simultaneously recorded central and peripheral arterial pressure pulses during rest, exercise and tilted position in man. Circ Res. 1955;3(6):623-32. doi:10.1161/01.RES.3.6.623.

4. Pauca AL, O'Rourke MF, Kon ND. Prospective evaluation of a method for estimating ascending aortic pressure from the radial artery pressure waveform. Hypertension. 2001;38(4):932-7. doi:10.1161/hy1001.096106.

5. Ohte N, Saeki T, Miyabe H, et al. Relationship between blood pressure obtained from the upper arm with a cuff-type sphygmomanometer and central blood pressure measured with a catheter-tipped micromanometer. Heart Vessels. 2007;22(6):410-5. doi:101007/s00380-007-0998-5.

6. Kollias A, Lagou S, Zeniodi ME, et al. Association of Central Versus Brachial Blood Pressure With Target-Organ Damage: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hypertension. 2016;67(1):183-90. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06066.

7. Wang KL, Cheng HM, Chuang SY, et al. Central or peripheral systolic or pulse pressure: which best relates to target organs and future mortality? J Hypertens. 2009;27(3):461-7. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283220ea4.

8. Roman MJ, Okin PM, Kizer JR, et al. Relations of central and brachial blood pressure to left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry: the Strong Heart Study. J Hypertens. 2010;28(2):384-88. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e328333d228.

9. Wohlfahrt P, Wichterle D, Seidlerova J, et al. Relation of central and brachial blood pressure to left ventricular hypertrophy. The Czech Post-MONICA Study. J Hum Hypertens. 2012;26(1):14-9. doi:10.1038/jhh.2011.78.

10. Avolio AP, Van Bortel LM, Boutouyrie P, et al. Role of pulse pressure amplification in arterial hypertension: experts' opinion and review of the data. Hypertension. 2009;54(2):375-83. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.134379.

11. Gubner RS, Ungerlieder HE. Electrocardiographic criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy: factors determining the evolution of the electrocardiographic patterns in hypertrophy and bundle branch block. Arch Intern Med (Chic). 1943;72(2):196-209. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1943.00210080052005.

12. Sokolow M, Lyon TP. The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar and limb leads. AmHeart J. 1949;37(2):161-86. doi:10.1016/0002-8703(49)90562-1.

13. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens. 2013;31(7):1281-357. doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc.

14. Cui R, Li Y, Krisztina G, et al. An association between central aortic pressure and subclinical organ damage of the heart among a general Japanese cohort: Circulatory Risk in Communities Study (CIRCS). Atherosclerosis. 2014;232(1):94-8. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.10.012.

15. Yang WY, Mujaj B, Efremov L, et al. ECG Voltage in Relation to Peripheral and Central Ambulatory Blood Pressure. Am J Hypertens. 2018;31(2):178-87 doi:10.1093/ajh/hpx157.

16. Chi C, Yu X, Auckle R, et al. Hypertensive target organ damage is better associated with central than brachial blood pressure: The Northern Shanghai Study. J Clin Hypertens. (Greenwich) 2017;19(12):1269-75. doi:10.1111/jch.13110.

17. Perez-Lahiguera FJ, Rodilla E, Costa JA, et al. Relationship of central and peripheral blood pressure to left ventricular mass in hypertensive patients. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2012;65(12):1094-100. doi:10.1016/j.recesp.2012.05.008.

18. Kotovskaya YuV, Kobzev RYu, Safarova AF, et al. Association between left ventricular myocardium mass and parameters of clinical, ambulatory and central blood pressure in young men. Arterial Hypertension. 2010;16(2):150-5. (In Russ.)

19. Sibiya MJ, Norton GR, Booysen HL, et al. Aortic backward waves rather than stiffness account for independent associations between pulse pressure amplification and left ventricular mass in a young to middle-aged sample. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2017;11(6):350-8.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jash.2017.04.003.


Review

For citations:


Tsvetkova E.E., Kuznetsov A.A., Denisova D.V., Ragino Yu.I., Voevoda M.I. Comparison of the association of brachial arterial pressure and parameters of central aortic pressure with left ventricular hypertrophy in the general population of Novosibirsk. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2019;(1):18-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2019-1-18-22

Views: 883


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1560-4071 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7620 (Online)