EVALUATION OF THE CALCIUM-PHOSPHOR HOMEOSTASIS AND PROINFLAMMATORY STATUS OF RECIPIENTS WITH CALCIUM DEGENERATION OF CARDIAC VALVES PROSTHESES
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2015-7-98-103
Abstract
Aim. To study calcium-phosphor homeostasis and proinflammatory status of the cardiac valves bioprostheses (BP) recipients related to their interference with calcium degeneration of biomaterials.
Material and methods. A retrospective assessment was performed of the calcium-phosphor metabolism and markers of non-specific inflammatory response in recipients of BP in mitral position: with histologically confirmed calcification — group I (n=22) and with normal morphology and prosthesis function — group II (n=48).
Results. In patients with BP degeneration, comparing to the recipients of biological prostheses with normal function at the background of moderate hypovitaminosis D (34,0 [21,0; 49,4] versus 40 [27,2; 54,0] pmol/L, р>0,05), osteoprotegerine deficiency (82,5 [44,2; 115,4] versus 113,5 [65,7; 191,3] pg/ml, р>0,05) and osteopontine (4,5 [3,3; 7,7] versus 5,2 [4,1; 7,2] ng/ml, р>0,05) there was statistically significant decrease of the bone isoenzyme of alkaline phosphatase (17,1 [12,2; 21,4] versus 22,3 [15,5; 30,5] E/L, р=0,01), and significant decrease of IL-8 (9,74 [9,19; 10,09] pg/ml versus 13,17 [9,72; 23,1] pg/ml, р=0,045) with general increase of proinflammatory serum markers activity.
Conclusion. Into the group of probable predictors determining the tempos of BP calcification, the following could be included: specifics of recipient metabolic status defined by the activity of bone resorption processes, and local and systemic inflammation.About the Authors
N. V. RutkovskayaRussian Federation
O. N. Khryachkova
Russian Federation
A. S. Golovkin
Russian Federation
A. V. Ponasenko
Russian Federation
A. N. Stasev
Russian Federation
O. K. Kuzmina
Russian Federation
L. S. Barbarash
Russian Federation
References
1. Thiene G, Valente M. Anticalcification strategies to increase bioprosthetic valve durability. J Heart Valve Dis. 2011; 20(1): 37-44.
2. Aronov WS. Osteoporosis, osteopenia and atherosclerotic vascular disease. Arch Med Sci. 2011; 7(1): 21-6.
3. Hjortnaes J, Butcher J, Figueiredo JL, et al. Arterial and aortic valve calcification inversely correlates with osteoporotic bone remodelling: a role for inflammation. Eur Heart J. 2010; 31(16): 1975-84.
4. Sophie EP, Aikawa E. Molecular imaging insights into early inflammatory stages of arterial and aortic valve calcification. Circ Res. 2011; 108: 1381-91.
5. Mahjoub Y, Mathieu P, Senechal M, et al. ApoB/ApoA ratio is associated with increased risk bioprosthetic valve degeneration. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61(7): 752-61.
6. Briand M, Pibarot P, Despres JP, et al. Metabolic syndrome is associated with faster degeneration of bioprosthetic valves. Circulation. 2006; 114: 1512-7.
7. Nollert G, Miksch J, Kreuzer E, et al. Risk factors for atherosclerosis and the degeneration of pericardial valves after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003; 126: 965-8.
8. Schoen FJ, Levy RJ. Calcification of tissue heart valve substitutes: progress toward understanding and prevention. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 1072-80.
9. Wilhelmi MH, Mertsching H, Wilhelmi M, et al. Role of inflammation in allogeneic and xenogeneic heart valve degeneration: immunohistochemical evaluation of inflammatory endothelial cell activation. J Heart Valve Dis. 2003; 12: 520-6.
10. Vattikuti R, Towler DA. Osteogenic regulation of vascular calcification: an early perspective. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004; 286: 686-96.
11. Hamerman D. Osteoporosis and atherosclerosis: biological linkages and the emergence of dual–purpose therapies. Q J Med. 2005; 98: 467-84.
12. Steitz SA, Speer MY, McKee MD, et al. Osteopontin inhibits mineral deposition and promotes regression of ectopic calcification. Am J Pathol. 2008; 161(6): 2035-46.
13. Yu PJ, Skolnick A, Ferrari G, et al. Correlation between plasma osteopontin levels and aortic valve calcification: Potential insights into the pathogenesis of aortic valve calcification and stenosis. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2009; 138 (1): 196-9.
14. Raaz-Schrauder D, Klinghammer L, Baum C, et al. Association of systemic inflammation markers with the presence and extent of coronary artery calcification. Cytokine. 2012; 57(2): 251-7.
15. Parvathy T, Divakaran N, Lalithakunjamma R, et al. Pathological effects of processed bovine pericardial. Artificial Organs. 2013; 37(7): 600-5.
Review
For citations:
Rutkovskaya N.V., Khryachkova O.N., Golovkin A.S., Ponasenko A.V., Stasev A.N., Kuzmina O.K., Barbarash L.S. EVALUATION OF THE CALCIUM-PHOSPHOR HOMEOSTASIS AND PROINFLAMMATORY STATUS OF RECIPIENTS WITH CALCIUM DEGENERATION OF CARDIAC VALVES PROSTHESES. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2015;(7):98-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2015-7-98-103