Preview

Russian Journal of Cardiology

Advanced search

PROGNOSTIC BLOCK-SCHEME OF CLINICAL OUTCOME OF ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME INTO NON-Q-INFARCTION. Part II

https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2015-6-53-60

Abstract

Aim. An invention of block-scheme of short-term personified prognosis of clinical outcome of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) into non-Q-myocardial infarction at hospital stage

Material and methods. Totally 68 patients included, with CHD diagnosis. As prognostic factors were taken the most informative intervals of concentrations of the parameters of subclinical nonspecific inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, cardiospecific changes in immune system and serum cardiomarkers. To test the parameters listed we used the method of hard-phase immune-enzyme analysis. The value of relative risk (RR) with confidence intervals (CI), value of absolute risk (AR), diagnostic efficacy (DE) of the applied methods were calculated in accordance to the clinical outcome of ACS into nonQ-MI together with the risk factor studied (concentration intervals). Statistical data processing was done with Statistica (v. 6.0) and “Biostat4.03”.

Results. Based on the complex analysis of the obtained results we invented a blockscheme for short-term personified prognosis of clinical outcome of ACS into non-Q-MI. It included the most significant intervals of concentrations of the parameters studied. Personified short-term prognosis of ACS into non-Q-MI during in-hospital stage is related to the concentration intervals: TP-I from 2,2 to 2,5 ng/ml; C-RP– from 15 to 20 mg/L;IL-1β — from 0 to 1 pg/ml; TNF-α— from 0,6 to 1 pg/ml; NO– from 12 to 20 mcM/L;ММР-9— from 400 to 600 ng/ml; TIMP-1— from 120 to 150 ng/ml; HC – from 15 to 17 mcM/L; NP – from 17 to 26 nM/L; AB to CL – from 7 to 10 U/ml and in 68% cases there are AB against cardiomyocytes. Patients having the parameters listed, at the moment of admittance, are in the high risk group for clinical outcome of ACS into non-Q-MI.

Conclusion. In the cases when during admittance the parameters of inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, serum cardiomarkers and immune markers get in the concentration intervals included into the block-scheme, these patients do not relate to a high risk group of clinicl outcome of ACS to non-Q-MI. This makes even at the early stage of hospitalization to perform treatment procedures in accordance to the standarts of management of occluded coronary vessels that lead to large-area non-Q-MI.

About the Authors

M. G. Alieva
Republic Hospital №2, Center for Specialized Urgent Medical Care (CSUMC), Makhachkala
Russian Federation


M. Z. Saidov
Dagestan State Medical Academy, Makhachkala
Russian Federation


A. A. Abdullaev
Dagestan State Medical Academy, Makhachkala
Russian Federation


A. Sh. Khasaev
Dagestan State Medical Academy, Makhachkala
Russian Federation


S. V. Adueva
Republic Hospital №2, Center for Specialized Urgent Medical Care (CSUMC), Makhachkala
Russian Federation


References

1. Bokeria LA, Samarodskaya IV, Klutchnikov IV. The questions of organization reperfusion therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Bulleten SCHVS of A. N. Bakulev RAMS 2011; 12(5): 13-21. Russian (Бокерия Л.А., Самородская И.В., Ключников И.В. Организационные вопросыo реперфузионного лечения пациентов с острым коронарным синдромом. Бюллетень НЦССХ им. А. Н. Бакулева РАМН 2011; 12(5): 13-21).

2. Postenkova OM, Kiselev AR, Gridnev VI, et al. The estimation of steps to myocardialreperfusion in patients with acute coronary syndrome with ST-elevation on the base of criteria American Cardiology College/ American heart association. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention 2013; 12(5): 40-45. Russian (Постенкова О.М., Киселёв А.Р., Гриднев В. И. и др. Оценка мероприятий по реперфузии миокарда у больных с острым коронарным синдромом с подъёмом сегмента S-T на основе критериев Американского колледжа кардиологии /Американской ассоциации сердца. Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика 2013; 12(5): 40-5).

3. Erlih AD, Grachianski NA. The acute coronary syndrome without ST-elevation in practice Russian hospitals: comparative results of risk score RECORD-2 and RECORD (on the base of date risk score RECORD). Cardiologia 2012; 10: 9-15. Russian (Эрлих А.Д. Грацианский Н.А. Острый коронарный синдром без подъёмов сегмента ST в практике российских стационаров: сравнительные данные регистров РЕКОРД-2 и РЕКОРД) Кардиология 2012; 10: 9-15).

4. Soejima H, Kishikawa H, Ogawa Y. Inflammatory biomarker for diagnosis of coronary diseases. Nihon. Rinsho. 2011; 69(1): 74-8.

5. Amodio G, Antonelli G, Di Serio F. Cardiac biomarkers in acute coronary syndromes: a review. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2010; 8(3): 388-93.

6. Manginas A, Bei E, Chaidaroglou A, et al. Peripheral levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein are elevated in patients with acute coronary syndromes: correlations with serum troponin I. Clin. Cardiol. 2005; 28(4): 182-6.

7. Brown DL, DesaiKK, VakiliBA, et al. Clinical and biochemical results of the metalloproteinase inhibition with subantimicrobial doses of doxycycline to prevent acute coronary syndromes (MIDAS) pilot trial. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2004; 24(4): 733-8.

8. Facila L, Nunez JE, Sanchis J, et al. Early determination of homocysteine levels in acute coronary syndromes, is it an independent prognostic factor? Int. J. Cardiol. 2005; 100: 275-9.

9. Eggers KM, Lind L, Ahlström H, et al. Prevalence and pathophysiological mechanisms of elevated cardiac troponin I levels in a population-based sample of elderly subjects. Eur. Heart J. 2008; 29(18): 2252-8.

10. Lund J, Qin OP, Iva T, et al. Circulating pregnancy-associated plasma protein a predict outcome in patients with acute coronary syndrome but no troponin I elevation. Circulation 2003; 108(16): 1924-6.

11. Ogawa A, Seino Y, Yamashita T, et al. Difference in elevation of N-terminal pro-BNP and conventional cardiac markers between patients with ST elevation vs non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Circ. J. 2006; 70(11): 1372-8. 1

12. Heeschen CC, Hamm W, Mitrovic V. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels for dynamic risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2004; 110(20): 3206-12.

13. Moe KT, Wong P. Current trends in diagnostic biomarkers of acute coronary syndrome. Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore 2010; 39(3): 210-5.

14. Chan CP, Rainer TN. Pathophysiological roles and clinical importance of biomarkers in acute coronary syndrome. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2013; 59: 23-63.

15. Alieva MG, Saidov MZ, Abdullaev АА, et al. Prognostic block-scheme of clinical outcome of acute coronary syndrome into q-myocardial infarction. Part I Russ J Cardiol 2015, 3(119): 93-102. Russian (Алиева М.Г., Саидов М.З., Абдуллаев А.А. и др. Прогностическая блок-схема клинического исхода острого коронарного синдрома в Q-инфаркт миокарда (Часть I). Российский кардиологический журнал 2015, 3 (119): 93-102).


Review

For citations:


Alieva M.G., Saidov M.Z., Abdullaev A.A., Khasaev A.Sh., Adueva S.V. PROGNOSTIC BLOCK-SCHEME OF CLINICAL OUTCOME OF ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME INTO NON-Q-INFARCTION. Part II. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2015;(6):53-60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2015-6-53-60

Views: 778


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1560-4071 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7620 (Online)